SAICA recently issued their 2026 SAICA Training Regulations, effective from 1 January 2026. Training officers must ensure that the current version of the training regulations is communicated to all role-players in the training programme, so that it may be applied, in relation to their responsibilities. An overview of the most significant changes from the previous version of the training regulations is provided below.   Key Changes in ISA 570 (Revised 2024) The terminology in the training regulations was aligned with the terminology used in the SAICA Training Programme and editorial consistency was applied [...]

The International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 570 (Revised 2024), Going concern, issued by the IAASB, responds to growing expectations from stakeholders for more robust auditor evaluations and reporting on management’s going concern assumptions. Effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026, the revised standard strengthens and clarifies the auditor’s responsibilities relating to the going concern assessment, and the implications for the auditor’s report. This article outlines the key changes introduced by the revised standard and explores their implications for auditors, management and those charged with governance. [...]

On 27 February 2025, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued the third edition of the IFRS for SMEs® Accounting Standard. This edition aligns SME accounting more closely with full IFRS — updating or introducing sections on foundational concepts, revenue, financial instruments, fair value, business combinations, and control — while intentionally deferring the amendment of sections on leases, due to complexity concerns. Key changes 1. Section 2: Concepts and Pervasive Principles Fully revised to align with the 2018 Conceptual Framework, this section now provides clearer guidance on developing accounting policies where the standard is silent. [...]

Misstatements in financial statements originate from errors or fraud. The risks of these occurring can only be appropriately determined with a thorough understanding of circumstances, systems and the industry. When applying knowledge and risk assessment in the audit, trends and transactions which do not correlate should raise concerns with the auditor, i.e. lead to professional scepticism.  The importance of applying professional scepticism When performing an audit, the engagement team must plan and perform the audit with professional scepticism, recognising that there may be circumstances and incentives by management causing the financial statements to be [...]

Difference between body corporates and homeowners’ associations While both body corporates and homeowners’ associations fall under Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) regulations, homeowners’ associations are not established under the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act (STSMA), but rather under the Companies Act (as non-profit companies) or under their own Constitution and Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI), in accordance with Common Law. Therefore, homeowners’ associations are required to be audited in terms of the Companies Act, and body corporates are required to be audited in terms of the Sectional Title Management Schemes Act.   Body Corporate [...]

Proactive Audit Quality: A Continuous Improvement Approach Under ISQM 1 Audit quality is crucial for the financial integrity of financial information relied upon by stakeholders. Yet, many firms take a reactive stance – waiting for firm-wide monitoring reports before addressing deficiencies. This delayed approach leads to recurring issues, last-minute fixes, and a compliance-driven, rather than an improvement-driven culture. ISQM 1 and ISA 220 (Revised) require firms to shift towards a proactive, risk-based, and continuous evaluation of audit quality to ensure that deficiencies are remediated in a timely and effective manner. Instead of relying mainly [...]

Bending the Rules Auditors often find themselves in a delicate situation where an audit client wants a certain outcome, while the rules do not allow it. The correct treatment is usually not popular, and auditors then often try to find a way around it, on the instruction of their client. When confronted with such situations, auditors should ask themselves whether they can still comfortably say that they are acting in the public interest, or whether their objectivity may be called into question in the circumstances. There is a fine line between right and wrong, and this [...]