The Brain Drain of Audit Quality

2026-06-01T15:13:52+02:00

What’s News? The Brain Drain of Audit Quality For decades, audit quality, in general, has failed to prevent audit failures. Upgraded audit standards, and stricter independence requirements have been implemented in an attempt to address the challenge. In my opinion, there are a number of environmental factors being overlooked in the formal structures that set audit standards and educational standards, causing a drain on knowledge and experience in the profession, (the so-called ‘brain drain’). I am listing a few: Computer skills In my opinion, the brain drain started when personal computers were introduced into audit. Many manual calculations, [...]

The Brain Drain of Audit Quality2026-06-01T15:13:52+02:00

Innovative new guidance supports audit firm adoption of emerging AI technologies

2026-05-29T11:27:52+02:00

LATEST UPDATE Innovative new guidance supports audit firm adoption of emerging AI technologies The Financial Reporting Council has published guidance to support audit firms in the responsible use of generative and agentic AI in audit engagements, helping firms manage risks to audit quality while realising efficiency and quality benefits. The guidance codifies good practice, rather than addressing identified deficiencies, and reinforces that auditors remain fully accountable for audit quality. At a glance: Generative and Agentic AI Guidance outlines a practical framework for building appropriate confidence in AI outputs, supported by professional judgment and illustrative real-world [...]

Innovative new guidance supports audit firm adoption of emerging AI technologies2026-05-29T11:27:52+02:00

Highlights from the March 2026 IAASB Meeting

2026-04-29T13:23:42+02:00

LATEST UPDATE Highlights from the March 2026 IAASB Meeting During the IAASB quarterly board meeting, available on: https://www.iaasb.org/meetings/iaasb-quarterly-board-meeting-0, the following was approved: The exposure draft of ISRE 2410 (Revised), available on: https://www.iaasb.org/consultations-projects/review-interim-financial-information-isre-2410 This will be published for public consultation in early May, with a 120-day comment period. The Technology Quality Management Workstream Action Plan to Develop Non-Authoritative Material, available on: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.iaasb.org/_flysystem/azure-private/2026-03/0260316-Agenda-Item-3F-Approved-Tech-QM-Action-Plan.pdf This sets out the scope, approach, governance, and timeline for developing non-authoritative materials to support consistent and effective application of our quality management standards when technological tools enabled by emerging technologies are used in [...]

Highlights from the March 2026 IAASB Meeting2026-04-29T13:23:42+02:00

IAASB Technology Position: Technology Catalogue of Issues and Possible Actions

2025-11-28T14:08:38+02:00

LATEST UPDATE IAASB Technology Position: Technology Catalogue of Issues and Possible Actions As part of the IAASB’s Technology Position, ongoing gap analyses are conducted to ensure standards keep pace with technological developments. This Technology Position is available on: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/technology-position-statement The findings of these analyses are captured in this Catalogue of Issues and Possible Actions. This living document serves as the IAASB’s cross-functional repository for technology-related issues, drawing on stakeholder feedback, outreach activities, and other inputs. It is updated at least semi-annually, or more frequently as needed. The catalogue supports a holistic approach to technology-related developments [...]

IAASB Technology Position: Technology Catalogue of Issues and Possible Actions2025-11-28T14:08:38+02:00

The Rabbit Hole of Substantive Testing

2025-11-04T13:02:54+02:00

What’s News? Your Content Goes Here For decades now, audit firms, especially small firms, or SMPs, as they are known nowadays, have insisted on the substantive approach, without any regard for controls. This was due to fears of blowing the budget, not knowing how to audit systems, or deciding that they would have to go substantive anyway, when controls prove to be ineffective. The result was that the audit client received less bang for their buck, in that feedback on system weaknesses was shoddy, and risks were not properly identified, as the requirements of ISA315 were interpreted as that [...]

The Rabbit Hole of Substantive Testing2025-11-04T13:02:54+02:00

Taking responsibility for quality on the engagement – Partner or EQR

2025-09-29T18:47:10+02:00

What’s News? Your Content Goes Here With the implementation of quality management systems to comply with ISQM, audit firms are compelled to be aware of threats to the ability of engagement teams to issue appropriate audit reports, and threats to the system of quality management to ensure that the firm as a whole does not issue inappropriate audit reports. When an engagement partner is nervous about a new industry, a very large client, or a complex audit, as examples, this would be seen as a threat. Typically, these threats require immediate attention, and engagement monitoring reviews will address [...]

Taking responsibility for quality on the engagement – Partner or EQR2025-09-29T18:47:10+02:00

Auditor and AI–How the Documentation Fixation will Blow Up in Our Faces

2025-08-26T11:05:22+02:00

What’s News? Your Content Goes Here Auditors are all excited about the advancements in AI, and are scrambling to implement this tool in the enhancement of their procedures on the one hand, while trying to figure out policies to curtail its abuse, and guide its proper use, on the other. In the meantime, they don’t have a clue about where its boundaries are, and what it is capable of. The intention is not to give you the solution to any of these mentioned dilemmas, but to pull you back to two basic audit and audit regulation principles. The [...]

Auditor and AI–How the Documentation Fixation will Blow Up in Our Faces2025-08-26T11:05:22+02:00
Go to Top